A current “buzzword” in our present day is “inclusive”. It’s a word tossed about frequently from particular people groups who feel their identity and worth as a person is either devalued or ignored. It’s also a word being used in our political and education arenas as well as media anchors on radio and television. Its first definition according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is “the act of including”. In order to be included, at first are people or things first excluded? If so, what determined the reason for that decision or what are or were the circumstances that caused or continue to leave someone feeling outside the circle of acceptance? Admittedly, I feel as though the word “inclusive” has come to the surface of our current culture to draw attention to those who feel “less than” when it comes to their gender, skin color, sexual orientation…anything that appears to be “outside” the norm of social acceptance. I also admit that I have and continue to struggle with my own thoughts and prejudices towards the uprising in promoting a person’s identity being rooted in those latter descriptions. When I struggle, I have nowhere else to go but to scripture. I cannot think of anyone who was more inclusive than Jesus, yet even He, whose ways and thoughts are not of this earth…or my own mind with all of its preconceived thoughts and opinions…has left me an example of “including” others who are very different than me without jeopardizing the truth of the gospel which, when applied to a dark hardened heart, brings forth repentance which is laying down former sin(s) and pursuing a life that seeks to be honoring and holy to Him alone. In order to teach ME His example, I looked at two people in the New Testament.
In John 8 Jesus is in a group of people, teaching in the temple courts. The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. After presenting “their case” against her to Jesus the question was asked that according to their law she should be stoned, but these men wanted to know what “HE” would say. In what remains a mystery to this day, Jesus gives a non verbal response and merely begins writing “something” on the ground. Questions continue to be pelted at Him which are met by Jesus standing to His feet by now and responding with his own question: “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her”. And, second mystery–He writes more words on the ground. Their plot, their numerous questions, and two lists penned in the dirt caused all of them to scatter until only Jesus and the woman remain. Alone. Can you imagine standing or sitting alone with Jesus? This new man who has been traveling among your communities teaching and healing? Performing miraculous acts? Preaching messages totally foreign to your Jewish traditions?
Does Jesus attack her because of her choices in life? She’s an adulteress. She’s involving herself in sexual relationships outside of being married. Is she herself married or is she a prostitute? Those details aren’t given to us other than her conduct, her choices fall under the category of sin…but now, alone with Jesus, those fallen sins are forgiven by Him as He declares that He will not condemn her. But, and please, don’t miss this–His final words to her are the life changer: “Go now and LEAVE your life of sin” (emphasis mine) He gives her two charges. Go. Leave. He doesn’t tell her to merely “go” and live your life. He doesn’t “leave” her as a now forgiven woman to return to the lifestyle that caused a frightful audience with her peers, religious leaders, and Him. It’s quite evident that being included in His deep love for her by the forgiveness of her sins is an admonition to “change”. This is a message for all who are living in deeply embedded lives of sin, a need to consider–Jesus does and will forgive–but He also requires “change”.
The second person I looked at was Philip’s encounter with an Ethiopian eunuch. Their encounter is described in Acts 8. When looking at their meeting, first I was curious about the definition for “eunuch” as used here. A quick search of the Greek word shows it’s defined as: alone in bed *castrated *Abstain from marriage. Further descriptions of the Ethiopian eunuch revealed he would have been a man with great responsibilities in the household of his Queen. So, I’m guessing he had a place of prominence in her home, entrusted to the care and supervision of others on her staff as well as property she owned. This is no ordinary man other than he is impotent–either from birth or intentional castration in order to serve under her rule.
This nameless royal servant is traveling and while doing so he is reading from Isaiah’s writings when Philip comes along. Philip isn’t merely walking up to the chariot either. He RUNS. He runs because “first” the Holy Spirit told him to go near “that” chariot and stay near it”. Why? Because, secondly, Philip HEARD the eunuch reading. And that’s when the encounter launches another miracle of conversion. A divine appointment between two very different men results in the eunuch understanding God’s plan of salvation, asking to be baptized and here’s the exciting part for me–”he went on his way rejoicing”. He didn’t get removed from his assigned duties to his queen. His physical mutilation wasn’t miraculously restored. He remained impotent physically but was filled supernaturally by understanding God’s Word, repenting of his own sin after understanding the good news of Jesus, and choosing baptism –in water along a desert road! (Incidentally, though I have NO proof…I am imagining that the eunuch is a black skinned man interacting with Philip who would probably have been very light brown or light skinned; he was working along the Sea of Galilee when Jesus called him to become a disciple = two very different people by definition of outward appearance who meet and engage with one another!)
A woman who was an adulteress, most likely feeling very empty without a stable healthy marriage relationship. An impotent man who must have felt some degree of emptiness, now filled with great joy. What do they have in common? Jesus literally met them where they were “at” in life, acknowledged their present situation without name calling. No finger pointing. No accusations or digging up their past with specific details. He did so by being physically present with the woman. He did it again through the obedience and ministry of Philip, serving a resurrected Christ who had ascended into heaven before the eunuch began a journey down a dry and arid desert road.
What does any of this have to do with being “inclusive”. My first thoughts are to remember that every person has been created in God’s image. That doesn’t mean that every person is perfect. Our fallen world creates many flaws, numerous failures, a myriad of lies–all of which bombard God’s desire for every one of us to embrace an identity that is rooted in Him and not defined by our gender…behaviors….outward appearance….skin tones…If that were the case, I would need to declare my identity as a short, plump, light skinned woman who has a tendency to gossip, overeat, become angry, resentful, judgemental…. While I could “be caught in those things” and brought before a group of my peers to be investigated…I am not. I’m a daughter of the Most High God. I met Jesus on my own dry desert road. I drank His living water. I tasted and saw that He was and IS good. I am forgiven. Redeemed. Set free. I am rooted in Him and the truth of all scripture, that He is for me and not against me. I can and pray He uses me to minister to those who feel as though they are “outside the circle of being included”…to bring them in…but not “leave” them the same when they step back into everyday life. That’s what Jesus did. It’s a hard truth, but then, it’s His Word, His teachings, His commands, not mine. Not yours. He’s God and we are not.
To My Readers:
Today’s blog entry is rooted from moments spent in self reflection…digging into scripture to help expose and describe how my heart feels not only today….how momentarily I grieved for this recent midterm election and some of the results. I read comments on my social media pages and I am deeply saddened by how our culture began describing people–good or bad–how far we have wandered from sound Biblical teachings founded on the Truth of a Most Holy God and His Son Jesus Christ. Christianity and those of us who follow Him, are quickly becoming a group that is being challenged by secular teachings and attempts to destroy/distort the very truth taught in Who God is and what He demands/requires of His people. So, today, I looked (very briefly) at the buzzword “inclusive” and penned my own thoughts. I know that Jesus wants me to love all people, but I also know that I am not required to condone what He calls sin.